EDITION ON-LINE

11 May 2006

From Area51 N.8

EDITORIAL - of Maurizio Baiata

The photograms that we publish in cover "would have to be" unknown of the Santilli Footage, that they seem to show scenes in exteriors, with military staff, one litter, a van, something hidden from one blanket, of the strange human inferior limbs... all a lot interesting.

But it will be true? In fact, the yellow of the Autopsy (Dissection) Averse, after 11 years, seems to carrying out, senz' not positive other, and Santilli - the orchestra director - changes music. We do not have to be adhered to how much has been learned, with dovizia of particular, thanks to Philip Mantle. The English investigator always has been between the most convinced supporters of surveyings until to the final solution of the puzzle and has been the first one, after the putting in 24 wave of the special tv of March slid on Sky One, in Great Britain, to hurl itself furious against Ray Santilli.

Who can blame Philip, after to have learned that the images notes like "Santilli Footage", transmitted all over the world and perhaps more famous of the same "Zapruder Film" (that the fruit of one fixed on film the fatal seconds of Dallas) is alone "reconstruction"? Santilli supports that draft of a "restoration" with the added one of photograms originates them - that they would be present in the disclosed filmato one in ` the 95 solo for very small a 5% - how much would remain of all the usable films turns from an operating fantomatico ("Jack Barnett") in New Mexico in 1947. In this number - for not assigned to the jobs, for who then it did not see the filmato one in tv and because revealing some all the implications are for we a duty - we have tried to go to the foundations of the vicissitude, to bring back the report of these convulsi last days and to face the essential question mark never have existed those films originate them?

If yes - as it supports Santilli - the frames from we it elaborates to you and it improves to you and those unknown ones (in cover) testify the fact that it is some still in possession, even though in limited amount? And because never have not been never given to assignment of the "restoration" of all those 95% (beyond 60 minuteren of images) to a specialistic structure (proposed to Santilli the collaboration of the Institute Light, but it answered that the British laboratories were to the height of the task) while the final result has been therefore frustrating?

Two hypothesis: or the films were unusable sin from the beginning and any attempt of recovery has been vain, and Santilli is a bugiardo. Or the films of "Jack Barnett" are an invention and the containers (with within the films, it opened some and I could control) that I saw in its office were anch' "taroccati" they and Santilli is of new a bugiardo. Nevertheless, not there are. Many things do not square at all.

Where is ended the filmato one of the "First Autopsy"? It stops Mr. Volger Spielberg? It would not be hour to pull it outside? It would demonstrate two things: or that they are both is made, the two filmati autoptici ones, in how much gain to you from the same one "pupazzo", or, the first one have been made to disappear, because it is authentic. A hypothesis is alone. While, a team of international investigators, for null convinced of the last developments, is to the job. We of it make part. And there are new, intriguers "still frames". Of it we will speak in the number of June.

I want but to close with a famous one on the contents of this number: those to Maussan and Vallée are interviews that help to understand. The articles of Boylan, Giordano and Barbera go to the heart of the problem of the Contact. The terrifying esternazione of prof. the Zichichi could not pass unnoticed. A po' is made that they emerge from Internet make us to reflect and also sorridere. To the next one.

Maurizio Baiata