|
Time's glory is to calm contending kings, to unmask falsehood and bring truth to light. -William Shakespeare |
|
Belfast, Ireland, 1 December 1995. For the first time a president of the United States of America commented on Roswell. And what he said was as trivial and unsatisfying as everything else that the government of the U.S.A. had till then revealed about the greatest mystery of the twentieth century. President Clinton's official visit to Ireland was a gesture of goodwill and American appreciation of the emerging accord in the conflict in Northern Ireland. The reference to Roswell was perhaps meant only to lend a popular note to his speech in connection with the illumination of a Christmas tree. He had recently received a letter from a thirteen-year-old Belfast boy, Clinton said, before addressing himself directly to the boy, "Ryan, in case you are out there, here is your answer: No! As far as I know, no extra-terrestrial spaceship crashed at Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947." The crowd laughed. "If the Air Force really recovered any extra-terrestrial bodies, they did not tell me," added the president with a broad grin, "and I want to know!" |
The wreckage, drawn by Bill McDonald based on an eyewitness description. |
"RAAF Captures Flying Saucer On Ranch In Roswell Region": With this headline of the Roswell Daily Record of 8 July 1947 the Roswell story began. |
Apparently the Air Force could tell him nothing more about Roswell, because "someone"
had removed and destroyed all reports connected with the incident in the files of 1947,
without any orders or official notes in any files to justify the action. At least, that
was the outcome of an official inquiry into the Roswell case, conducted during 1994/1995
by the General Accounting Office, the investigating arm of the U.S. Congress, at the
instigation of a congressman from New Mexico. Could this have been an attempt to hush
something up? (2)
|
|
At the time the American public swallowed this explanation, but the mightiest man of
the other superpower, namely the Russian dictator Joseph Stalin, did not. He was
informed about the incident by the KGB, the Soviet Secret Service, and the KGB was
convinced that the "weather balloon" declaration was a political feint. The Bomb
Group 509 was considered the best trained unit of the U.S. Air Force and had repeatedly
been employed in secret missions. Members of this unit had discharged the atom bombs on
Hiroshima and Nagasaki, flew the most recent aircraft and certainly would have been
capable of distinguishing a weather balloon from a "flying saucer." In order to clarify
the situation, Stalin ordered three of his best scientists to investigate if the object
in question could be a threat to the security of the Soviet Union.
|
General Roger Ramey and his deputy commander, Lt. Col. Thomas Jefferson DuBose at the press conference in Gen. Rameys office with the remains of the Rawin target of a weather balloon. |
|
This resulted in a whole series of official UFO studies by the Soviets, of which the West has learned only recently, after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The last of these studies was not only intended to discover the origin and intentions of the mysterious interlopers, but also had an ulterior motive. The Russians suspected--not without reason--that most of the "stealth technology" of the "invisible" bombers of the USA had been developed from research on crashed UFOs. They now hoped to locate a crashed UFO, so as to analyze it and catch up with the Americans' advanced technology. "If we discover the secrets of the UFOs we shall be in a position to win the race against the potential enemy, using the extra-terrestrial know-how regarding speed, materials and camouflage", said Colonel Boris Sokolov to the American journalist George Knapp. And Sokolov must have known what he was talking about: he was head of the UFO Office of the Defense Department in Moscow.(5) |
![]() The mysterious Hangar 18 on the Wright Field Base. The UFO wreckages from Roswell and Socorro were brought here. |
President Clinton too may soon learn the truth about the Roswell incident. No lesser person than Laurance Rockefeller, multimillionaire and philanthropist, is determined to do everything possible to make the public aware, during his lifetime, of what the government has long known about UFOs. At his behest leading UFO investigators compiled a 150-page study. A thousand copies were made with the intention of sending a copy to every congressman, senator, and scientific adviser in the U.S. In this "Rockefeller Report," which also deals with testimonies from ex-officers and astronauts "who contradict the statement of the Air Force denying the landing of extra-terrestrials," the Roswell incident marks the central theme. Leading Roswell investigators Stanton Friedman, William Moore, Kevin Randle, and Don Schmitt so far have interviewed over three hundred eyewitnesses.(6) |
|
Or perhaps we shall learn the truth through another channel. In the summer of 1995 the British film producer Ray Santilli created a worldwide sensation with his statement that he had acquired film material from a former photographer of the U.S. Army Air Force, showing the salvaging of the Roswell wreck and the autopsy performed on two extraterrestrials. (Click here for an Alien Autopsy Film Q and A with Ray Santilli.) The discussion about the authenticity of these films is still going on, but meanwhile preparations have begun to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the Roswell occurrence on July 4, 1997. According to inside rumors Steven Spielberg is making a big movie for that date, which would also include original material. "Spielberg to Expose UFO cover-ups," said the headlines above the first announcement regarding this project in the British newspaper Daily Mirror, which goes on to report that the world-famous director and producer of E.T. and Close Encounters of the Third Kind is working on an eighty-million-dollar movie dealing with "the UFO crash and the political intrigue that followed." Known to insiders only as Project "X," the film will apparently include "previously unseen film footage of the flying saucer crash scene taken by a military officer," which have been passed on to Spielberg.(7) |
A scene from the Autopsy Footage: The entity on the operation table. |
|
When six weeks later another newspaper, the Daily Star, repeated this announcement in
its movie section(8), British UFO researcher Philip Mantle asked
the paper's acting editor in chief, Michael Hellicar, where he had got this information.
The answer was: |
|
"Our story about Steven Spielberg acquiring footage of the UFO crash in Roswell is one
hundred per cent accurate. It comes from a source who is involved in the projected
movie about the crash. The working title, the meaning of which will be known to you,
is Majestic-12. I know little more than that, except that Spielberg's production
company, Amblin, is trying to keep the movie secret, because they fear another
studio will beat them to it. However, a rival version will be lacking in one
sensational detail: the official crash pictures. |
|
We can only wait and see what comes out of all these rumors about impending revelations. Perhaps the powers that be, which were behind the hushing up of the Roswell occurrence, will prevent the truth from ever getting out. But it is also possible that "someone" is permitting the truth to leak out piece by piece. Santilli's film, The Roswell Autopsy, genuine or otherwise, could be the first step in this direction, and the Spielberg film, if it is not prematurely blocked by restrictions, could be the next. But no matter when the truth about the happenings at Roswell comes to light, it will bring about a change in all of us. Michael Hesemann and Philip Mantle.
|
|
|
1 AP announcement of 1 December 1995. 2 United States General Accounting Office, "Results of a Search for Records Concerning the 1947 Crash near Roswell, New Mexico" (GAO/NSIAD-95-187), Washington, D.C., 1995. 3 Roswell Daily Record, Roswell, NM, 8 and 9 July 1947. 4 Rabotshaya Tribuna, Moscow, 13 August 1991. 5 Gresh, Bryan, "Soviet UFO Secrets," in: MUFON UFO Journal, Seguin, TX, October 1993. 6 New York Daily News, New York, 18 December 1995. 7 Daily Mirror, London, 22 December 1993. 8 Daily Star, London, 1 February 1994. 9 Letter by Michael Hellicar, Assistant Editor, Daily Star, to Philip Mantle, 3 February 1994. |